Ten Biggest Questions for the Sixers Off-Season: No. 10. Where Are We Now (And Where Are We Going)?

Ten Biggest Questions for the Sixers Off-Season: No. 10. Where Are We Now (And Where Are We Going)?

Over the rest of the playoffs, while 16 teams compete for the Larry
O'Brien trophy--none of which are the Philadelphia 76ers--I'll be taking
some time to focus on the long off-season that the Sixers have ahead of
themselves, and the many burning questions that face them as they
attempt to recover from the most disastrous season of the post-Iverson
era. I'll be addressing the ten biggest of those questions, counting
down from ten to one, with the most-biggest hopefully coming around the
time that it's actually time for the wheeling and dealing to begin.


Most of the ten questions are specific ones, but for #10, I wanted
to kick off with something more general, a question that will influence
the decisions behind every other question on this list: What's the deal
with the Philadelphia 76ers? This season was so incredibly confusing,
with so many things going unexpectedly wrong (and a rare couple actually
going unexpectedly right) that it's almost impossible to actually gauge
where this team is at right now. And if you can't gauge where the team
is, it's impossible to have a sense of where the team's going, and how
to get them there.


So let's take a minute to assess what the Sixers have going for them
at the moment--which Michael Levin of Liberty Ballers has gone on
record is just saying "Jrue and short-term contracts," but I think that
sells us a tiny bit short. I'd say that our assets, in both a specific
and overarching sense, are as follows, in descending order of worth:


1. Jrue Holiday
2. Cap space (estimated at about $11 million this off-season, assuming free agents walk)
3. Short-term contracts (only Thaddeus Young, Jason Richardson and Jrue Holiday currently last beyond next year)

4. Thaddeus Young
5. High-pedigree players with arguable remaining upside (Evan Turner, Spencer Hawes, sorta Arnett Moultrie)
6. A decent pick (#11 if outside the lottery) in the upcoming draft
7. The sign-and-trade rights to Andrew Bynum


It's not a ton, but it's not a terrible place to start from, either.
It's arguably a better situation than the Sixers found themselves in
four years ago, when they had cashed in all their remaining cap space on
signing Elton Brand and extending Andre Iguodala, only to end up as
mediocre as ever. At the very least, the Sixers have options, and can
use some combination of those seven assets (particularly #s 2-7, since
#1 is the most unlikely to be shifted) to move forward in a specific
direction, without finding themselves stuck in the middle with Jrue.


Of course, the question then becomes: What direction do we go in?
The way I see it, teams like the Sixers have three possible answers to
this:

1. Going all in--spending our remaining cap space on the
biggest fishes in free agency, trading our more moveable assets for
firmer core pieces, and attempting to make a run at the Eastern
Conference as soon as next season.

2. Biding time--doing more what we did last off-season, signing
low-cost, low-impact players on short-term deals that help us tread
water in the middle of the pack, keeping our personnel and financial
flexibility as we wait around for another MegaDeal to present itself.

3. Rebuilding completely--stripping down of all but our most essential
player personnel (arguably everyone but Jrue), clearing the books and
hoarding as many young prospects and draft picks as possible, and
looking to be competitive again three or four years down the line.


All three approaches have their advantages and disadvantages, and
none of them are likely to be totally satisfying to the fans, the
players or the front office. And of course, all of it hinges first and
foremost on what the Sixers already know and what they will continue to
find out about the Funny-Looking Kid With the Big Hair, and whether
resigning him is an option that will be a gigantic first domino to fall,
starting an off-season chain reaction that will essentially dictate
every decision the team makes between now and October.


But assuming Bynum's a no-go--and we'll talk about that possibility
more later on, natch--I would hope option #1 is out for the Sixers. You
could say that circumstances were against them this season and they're
not actually as bad as they looked, but I don't think even the most
optimistic of Sixers fans would say that the team could add any one
player likely to be available in free agency besides Bynum (and very
arguably not even Bynum) and instantly become a serious competitor in
the East. They're unlikely to be able to turn any of their low-cost,
medium-upside players into a difference-maker, and very likely, they'd
end up tapping themselves out at the 5th or 6th best team in the East,
while exhausting all their remaining assets to do so. No thanks.


More likely, it seems like the team will either tread water for a
bit or rebuild completely. The latter would be a tough sell to a fanbase
who just last off-season was expecting their team to actually be able
to compete with the Heat, and is already incredible short on good will,
and it's hard to imagine Aron and DiLeo and company quite having the
stomach for it. If I were a betting man, I'd say the team goes with
option #2, eschewing making any long-term commitments, hoping that their
young core either grows into something real or at least ups the trade
value of the respective pieces considerably, and trying to stay
competitive enough to at least be in the playoff hunt for the season.
It's not very sexy, and it might not be the most productive long-term
play, but it's probably the most practical option for this team right
now.


It's cold comfort to say after a season like the one we just had
that things could always be worse, but for the Sixers, they really
could--they're a team with young, reasonably priced talent and
legitimate maneuverability, which is the second-best place you can be in
in the NBA, next to actually having really good players. If they have
to rebuild, they don't have to totally start again from zero, like the
Magic or Bobcats are doing, and if they decide to go for the playoffs,
they're closer than the Kings or Pistons to getting there. But there's
still a long way to go and not a ton of room for error, and if the
Sixers aren't careful, they could end up staring down another four or
five seasons of basketball with results depressingly similar to this
season.

Instant Replay: No. 1 Villanova 78, Providence 68

usa-josh-hart-villanova-providence.jpg
USA Today Images

Instant Replay: No. 1 Villanova 78, Providence 68

BOX SCORE

Seniors Josh Hart and Kris Jenkins combined for 44 points, 10 rebounds and eight assists and No. 1 Villanova held off Providence, 78-68, in a Big East game at the Wells Fargo Center Saturday afternoon.
 
Villanova extended a four-point halftime lead to as much as 20 points before hot-shooting Providence closed to within nine with five minutes left. Villanova then went on a 13-3 run to put the game out of reach.
 
Hart had 25 points, five rebounds and four assists for the Wildcats, and Jenkins added 19 points, four boards and four assists. Both shot over 50 percent.
 
Sophomore Mikal Bridges scored 15 points, matching his Big East career high, and also had three rebounds and three assists, and Jalen Brunson contributed 13 points to go with three rebounds and four assists.
 
Providence stayed in the game by shooting 13 for 26 from three against the No. 3 three-point shooting defense in Division 1.
 
What it means
Villanova improved to 19-1 overall and 7-1 and in first place in the Big East. The Wildcats have won five in a row since losing at Butler on Jan. 4.
 
Providence fell to 13-8 and 3-5 in the conference and 1-6 on the road. The Friars have lost six of eight since an 11-2 start.
 
Villanova is now 47-34 all-time at the Wells Fargo Center but 14-2 in its last 16 games at the South Philly arena.
 
Stat of the day
Providence shot better from three (50 percent) than two (44 percent). The Friars made 13 threes and just nine two-pointers.

Turning point
Providence trailed by just four at halftime at 35-31, but Bridges opened the second half with a steal and fast-break reverse layup and a jumper from the top of the key to start an 8-0 run that gave Villanova a 12-point lead. The Friars never got any close than eight points the rest of the game.
 
By the numbers
• Providence’s 50 percent shooting from three is the highest against ‘Nova since North Carolina shot 65 percent in the national championship game on April 4 in Houston.

• Villanova’s bench scored just two points.

• Providence’s 13 threes are the most by a Big East team against Villanova since Doug McDermott and Creighton had 21 in a 28-point win three years ago this week.

• Rodney Bullock led Providence with 17 points (3 for 5 from three), Jalen Lindsey added 14 (4 for 7 from three) and Isaiah Jackson came off the bench to score 12 (3 for 3 from three).

• Darryl Reynolds' last two double-digit rebound games have both been against Providence.
 
What's next
Villanova travels to Milwaukee for a Tuesday night game against Marquette. The Golden Eagles are 12-6 overall and 3-3 in the Big East with a game later Saturday at Creighton.
 
Villanova has won nine straight games against Marquette, since the Golden Eagles — then ranked No. 17 — came back from 18 points down to win 82-78 at the Wells Fargo Center in January 2012.