Nick Foles Era, Eagles Youth Movement Could Be Temporary

Nick Foles Era, Eagles Youth Movement Could Be Temporary





The other day, friend of the Level John Gonzalez wrote a
piece on Nick Foles entitled, “How will Foles perform as permanent starter?

Permanent? I realize that wasn’t in the sense that Foles
will still be quarterbacking the Eagles for the remainder of the team’s
existence, but there is nothing “permanent” about the final four games of the
season, either – not for Bryce Brown, Fletcher Cox, or any other rookie, not
for anybody on the current roster for that matter. When Andy Reid is inevitably
replaced this January, there is going to be a culture change in Philadelphia,
and that means no one is safe.

(Except Alex Henery. Henery is safe. That dude's a baller, and I don't think anybody is that fanatical about place kickers.)

Is that something of a melodramatic viewpoint to have? Look,
I don’t expect the next head coach to come in and gut the roster just for the
sake of gutting it. Foles will be here next year, as will Brown, Cox, Mychal
Kendricks, Dennis Kelly, etc. They will have opportunities to become the
building blocks of the future like we all hoped they would.

Forgive me though if I don’t get overly excited about
anything I see from these kids over the next four games. With a new head coach
comes new schemes, and one thing about the NFL is not every player is a fit for
every system. Not every head coach has patience with the players he was given
when “his guys” are available.

Foles is hardly what I would call in any type of permanent
situation. He’s auditioning, not necessarily even for the job of starting
quarterback, but for the right to compete for the job in 2013. What are the odds
somebody waltzes in here and declares Foles is the future based on these eight
games, before they’ve had so much as a conversation? Keep in mind this is a
third-round pick, so it’s not an investment on the same level of an Andrew Luck
or Robert Griffin.

The next head coach is probably going to hold a competition.
Foles will participate, as will a veteran most likely, somebody who knows whatever
system is installed – who knows, maybe it’s Michael Vick. Depending on how
things go, there could even be another rookie in the mix. How Foles performs the
rest of the way will probably have a lot to do with the quality of competition
brought in, but unless he is dramatically improved, it’s difficult to see him
being handed the reins.

The same could go for some of these other guys as well. Kelly is the
latest rook to garner praise since he took over at right tackle. Howard
Mudd will be gone at the end of the year though, and his blocking scheme could
go with him. Will Kelly struggle to adjust to a new scheme?

In all likelihood, the Eagles will try to make a coaching
hire that would keep a 4-3 defense in place, because that’s what fits their
current personnel. Should they land on somebody who feels strongly about a 3-4
however, that mean huge role changes for Cox and Kendricks?

Maybe some are versatile enough to make the jump, maybe some
are not. Without knowing who will be coaching the Eagles next season, we can
assume nothing about how this team will be shaped moving forward. No matter how much promise and potential the class of 2012 demonstrates, every one of them has to prove themselves again next year.

Carson Wentz falls far behind Elliott, Prescott in Rookie of Year odds

Carson Wentz falls far behind Elliott, Prescott in Rookie of Year odds

Carson Wentz's Rookie of the Year odds took a hit, the Eagles' Super Bowl odds shortened and the Vikings' lengthened after Sunday's 21-10 win.

The Eagles are 33/1 to win it all, a week after being listed by Bovada at 50/1. The Vikings, meanwhile, went from 7/1 to 9/1. They still have the third-shortest Super Bowl odds in the NFL and are two spots ahead of the Cowboys (14/1). 

Wentz, who had his worst statistical game against Minnesota, is now 9/1 to win NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year, according to Bovada. Last Wednesday, he was 6/1.

Wentz trails Cowboys studs Ezekiel Elliott (2/5) and Dak Prescott (11/5) on that leaderboard.

As far as this week, Wentz is favored to throw for more yards than Prescott. Wentz is 5/7 to outgain Prescott through the air in Week 8, while Prescott is 1/1 to outgain Wentz.

Elliott's over/under rushing total against the Eagles is 99.5. He's rushed for 130-plus yards in each of his last four games, and the odds are 3/1 that he'll reach that number again this week. 

The Eagles have allowed just one 100-yard rusher this season, Washington's Matt Jones (16 for 135).

Elliott is also now on pace to break Eric Dickerson's rookie rushing record. Dickerson had 1,808 in 1983; Elliott is on pace for 1,875. Will Elliott break that 33-year-old mark? A "yes" bet pays 2/1; a "no" bet pays 1/3.

Dave Hakstol did Steve Mason a favor by challenging Sabres' 3rd goal

Dave Hakstol did Steve Mason a favor by challenging Sabres' 3rd goal

Many, though not all hockey games, have a tipping point or pivotal moment that factors into the outcome.
Sometimes it’s obvious what it was and when the moment occurred. Other times, it’s overshadowed by something else on the ice.
Ask the Flyers which moment would define their come-from-behind 4-3 shootout victory over Buffalo on Tuesday and the response will be virtually unanimous: when Dmitry Kulikov leveled Jakub Voracek with a high hit that made contact to the head in the third period.
Voracek was forced off the ice under the NHL’s concussion protocol.
That hit incensed the Flyers, who went on to score two power-play goals and tie the game, 3-3. The comeback was on.
Yet there was a less obvious but significant point that happened late in the second period, and it concerned goalie Steve Mason.
Matt Moulson had given Buffalo a 3-0 lead on Michal Neuvirth at 15:43, when Flyers coach Dave Hakstol elected to make a goalie switch.
Rather than call a simple timeout to buy Mason some warm-up time and allow his team to collect itself on the bench, Hakstol challenged the goal, claiming “goalie interference.”
Replays won’t show any direct interference on the shot itself. Neuvirth was speared several seconds before the play developed.
Hakstol knew the goal would likely not be overturned, but his strategy was to buy time for Mason and his team. By using a challenge, he knew the review process would take a lot longer than the 60-second timeout.
Either way, he was going to use his only timeout.
“You know what, I think we needed a timeout at that time, anyway,” Hakstol said coyly. “Pretty low probability of it being successful. Everything worked out well in the end.”
Mason appreciated what his coach did, too. Buying extra time for you?
“Yeah, probably,” Mason replied. “Regardless of the situation, you’re sitting on the bench, you know? You’re not really gauged as much as when you’re playing, obviously. So, you just try and ramp things up as quickly as possible.”
Mason had two saves in that shortened period, five in the third period and one in the overtime to register his second victory.
“There’s a never-quit attitude in this room,” he said. “We showed in Chicago — we were just talking about that. Unfortunately, we weren’t able to close that one out.
“But guys have a belief that you get one [moment] and it comes. [Travis Konecny] got us going with his first NHL goal, which is great. The guys really pushed to capitalize on their chances.” ​