Despite win, the Flyers still aren't pleased with their offense
Braydon Coburn celebrates with Wayne Simmonds after scoring the go-ahead goal in the Flyers' 2-1 win over the Rangers. (AP)
Ten random observations from the Flyers’ 2-1 victory the New York Rangers (see Instant Replay).
Let’s start with some positives -- the Flyers finally won a game, after all.
1. Finally, some excitement! Seriously -- after a week off following that wretched loss to the Pittsburgh Penguins, it was refreshing to see Matt Read hit the back of the net on a shorthanded breakaway Thursday night. I was at the Eagles game on Sunday, and I admit I was worried I’d have to watch a third straight game of, well, tedious play. Of course, it’s a shame that goal was neither five-on-five nor on the power play -- situations in which the Flyers really need to connect.
2. Nine games in to the 2013-14 season, the Flyers still haven't scored three goals in a game. But hey, it was nice to see them win a game 2-1, instead of lose one.
3. But the power play … ouch. At the end of this one, the Flyers had registered one goal in their last 25 opportunities on the man advantage. That’s not going to cut it -- especially when they squander opportunities like they had late in the second and early in the third against the Rangers: A five-minute power play. It’s curious why they’ve struggled so blatantly on the power play this season, considering even last year they were third-best in the league and it’s not as if their roster has changed wildly.
4. I’m sticking with the negative here for a bit, so bear with me. But did it seem to anyone else that the Flyers weren’t doing the one thing they’ve been saying all along they need to do? That is, keep things simple? Instead of the game plan -- peppering rookie Rangers goalie Cam Talbot with as many shots as possible and through lots of traffic -- too many times they tried to make a pretty play, or an extra pass, or some other unnecessary move.
5. Benoit Pouliot’s hit on Max Talbot: One of the scariest plays you’ve seen in hockey recently? That kind of hit from behind, unintentional though it might be, is exactly what the NHL is looking to eliminate from the game. Pouliot received a five-minute major (not that it really benefited the Flyers) as well as a game misconduct and will possibly receive a call from the league’s discipline office. However, the fact that Talbot returned to the game will likely save him from serving any kind of suspension.
6. Was Vinny Lecavalier really ready to return tonight? Yes, his skating is nowhere near where it was, say, five years ago, even when he’s healthy. But the Flyers’ center-turned-winger was not moving well at all Thursday night. This isn’t the time of year to rush back from injuries -- could he have been pushing it, wanting desperately to return and try to help his team out of its funk? Either way, not an impressive performance from the veteran Lecavalier against the Rangers.
7. For those reasons, I’m not ready to pass judgment on the Claude Giroux-Lecavalier experiment. Yet. I still think it’s a combination that could work, and eventually jump-start both players. Giroux needs a winger who’s able to not just accept a sneaky pass, but hold onto the puck and make a necessary play. He hasn’t really had one of those since … wait for it … Jaromir Jagr.
8. The Flyers made Cam Talbot look good. True, it can be tough to prepare for a rookie goaltender, but this guy isn’t the second coming of Henrik Lundqvist. By now, you probably saw the stat of the day: In college, Read (Bemidji State) had 12 goals and 12 assists in 13 games when facing Cam Talbot in college (Alabama-Huntsville).
9. Braydon Coburn’s goal, which brought the score to 2-1, was his second of the season. And that means he, a defenseman, is second on the Flyers in goal-scoring. That’s not acceptable, if the team wants to win games, that is.
10. So what do the Flyers need? At this point it’s obvious they need something, right? Is it just that they need the kids -- Sean Couturier, Brayden Schenn, Jakub Voracek -- to elevate their games? Or do they actually need help to be brought in from the outside? My opinion -- and I wrote about this in last week’s Random Observations -- is that they need help on offense. But who, and how? That’s the question.