Contrary to Belief, Mayor's Cup a Plus for both Temple and City

Contrary to Belief, Mayor's Cup a Plus for both Temple and City

The third annual Mayor's Cup between the Temple Owls and Villanova Wildcats kicks off this evening at 7 p.m. from inside Lincoln Financial Field (ESPN 3/1210 AM).

Through two seasons, the series is split 1-1, with both contests delivering high drama and plenty of late-game heroics. With the play so evenly matched in the first two seasons, the Mayor's Cup has been quite often, and frankly unfairly, characterized as something of a lose-lose for Temple.

Stop us if you've heard this before.

Should the Temple Owls prove successful in beating the Villanova Wildcats, they stand to generate little but the following dismissal from those already skeptical of the program, "You beat a team you're supposed to be better than—congratulations." On the flip side, should the Owls lose a heartbreaker to a I-AA program, as they did following the game's first playing in 2009, Temple supporters are likely to hear more of that same, pithy remark they've been forced to endure for so long: "Same ol' Temple."

So, rather than retreading that "same ol' argument" (again), here's a look at why the Mayor's Cup is actually a boon for both Temple and the city.

First, this game captures a greater level of local media attention than either squad would ordinarily receive on their own against a different opponent. Specifically, it sparks an interest for two programs stuck in a region more generally concerned with the exploits of an institution who plays its home games roughly three-and-a-half hours away.

Though college football will more than likely never reach the level of college basketball in Philadelphia, there's no reason for it to be shut out altogether, and this game helps to pave those necessary in-roads in securing public appeal. Really, Temple and Villanova have taken the Big 5 blueprint and run with it, proving that local rivalries do matter and can generate interest in sports other than basketball.

As Temple has struggled to match the opening night attendance of the Mayor's Cup throughout their last two seasons, Villanova continues to question whether or not they can generate a large enough fan base to satisfy the Big East. Still, there's no doubt the two can draw in tandem.

If last year's figure of more than 32,000 in the seats is any indication, the game will more than likely prove—if we exclude the 9/17 Penn State game—Temple's largest gate of the year for a third straight season. While some may object to it from a strict football perspective (see the "lose-lose" sentiment above), it's hard to argue against the financial rewards motivating both schools.

Granted, attendance did receive a bump in 2010—up approximately 5,000 from the year before—when the university offered a discount to any fans who already held tickets to the Phillies game two hours later. Still, with more than 45,000 sports fans not at CBP tonight, this year's game could do even better than last's in attracting fans to the stadium.

And if you're still hung up on that whole "Temple is a no-win position" myth, then consider the following. The Temple Owls lost the 2009 Mayor's Cup and went on to play in their first bowl game in thirty years. After winning their match up versus 'Nova in 2010, the Owls were left out in the cold as one of only two eligible teams not to play in a year end bowl.

Here's the takeaway, the Mayor's Cup will not make or break Temple's season. The Owls are not in some inescapable hell hole of a season opener. And if you remain so jaded as to continue to bury the program as that "same ol' Temple," then a win or loss in this game isn't likely to sway your opinion anyway and you can feel free to continue enjoying your outdated and unnecessary cynicism.

The Temple Owls are an improved football team. The Villanova Wildcats have been one of the best FCS teams in the country the past few years and have aspirations of moving to the Big East.

This is a good game. This is a good rivalry. Stop worrying for two seconds about "what the Mayor's Cup really means," and start having some fun with it. You might even surprise yourself and have a good time watching college football in Philadelphia. Don't feel guilty. It'll be a good thing.

As Temple head coach Steve Addazio has repeated so often over the last week, geographic rivalries are what make college sports so special, and we'd be remiss to overlook something that meaningful in our own backyard.

Now, assuming we failed to get you interested, you will find below a video of coach Addazio from his Mayor's Cup press conference last week. If you can watch that man speak, and not become yourself excited, or at least develop an appreciation for the room in which he's standing (see the vid), then it's not altogether impossible you're in a coma. But before you hear from coach, here are some quick updates on the Temple Owls heading into this evening's game.

--Coach Steve Addazio announced on Monday that the decision as to who will start at quarterback—either Mike Girardi or Chris Coyer—will be announced immediately prior to game time. As of Monday afternoon, Gerardi was listed No. 1 on the depth chart.

--Temple University quarterback Chester Stewart and defensive back Kee-ayre Griffin have been suspended for week 1 after violating team rules. The specific nature of the infractions has not been released.

--Junior running back Ahkeem Smith will be starting Thursday night, but not where you'd expect. Smith, who was slated to struggle for touches behind runners Bernard Pierce and Matt Brown, has been moved to the WILL linebacker position and is, according to the Inqy's Keith Pompey, really enjoying his new role with the team.

--Finally, Temple athletic director Bill Bradshaw announced today that the university has signed a multi-year agreement with 1210 AM WPHT for the broadcasting rights to Owls football and basketball games. Harry Donahue will be staying on for his 17th season as the play-by-play voice of both teams. Well alriiight.

--And now, Steve Addazio:

Instant Replay: White Sox 9, Phillies 1

Instant Replay: White Sox 9, Phillies 1

BOX SCORE

CHICAGO — Jake Thompson’s difficult big-league baptism continued in the Phillies’ 9-1 interleague loss to the Chicago White Sox on Tuesday night.
 
The rookie right-hander was tagged for seven runs in five innings. He allowed eight hits and walked four as his ERA in four starts since coming up from Triple A swelled to 9.78. Only Mike Maddux (9.98) in 1986 had a higher ERA for the Phillies in his first four big-league starts.
 
Offensively, the Phillies did little against White Sox lefty Carlos Rodon. They had just five hits for the game.
 
The Phillies have lost five of their last seven and are 58-68 on the season. They have been outscored 18-1 in their last two games.
 
Starting pitching report
Thompson, 22, has been a much different pitcher since coming to the majors than he was in his last 11 starts at Triple A Lehigh Valley. He went 8-0 in those 11 starts and recorded a 1.21 ERA while allowing just 10 earned runs in 74 1/3 innings. He gave up just 52 hits and 18 walks over that span while striking out 42.
 
In four starts with the big club, he has given up 22 hits and 21 earned runs in 19 1/3 innings. He has walked 13 and struck out 13.
 
Two of the four walks that Thompson gave up in this game became runs.
 
Five of the eight hits he allowed were for extra bases, including a pair of homers.
 
Rodon, 23, was the third pick in the 2014 draft, four ahead of Aaron Nola. The lefty held the Phillies to three hits over 6 2/3 scoreless innings. He walked one.
 
Bullpen report
David Hernandez was tagged for two runs.
 
At the plate
Freddy Galvis broke up the White Sox’s shutout bid with a solo homer off reliever Chris Beck in the seventh. Galvis has 13 homers.
 
Jose Abreu and Justin Morneau hit back-to-back homers against Thompson in the fifth inning to help the Sox pull away.
 
Abreu has homered in three straight games.
 
Minor matters
Pitcher Alec Asher, who serving an 80-game suspension for testing positive for a PED, has begun a minor-league rehabilitation assignment with the Phillies’ Gulf Coast League team. Asher is expected to be activated by the big club during the second week of September and he could make several starts down the stretch as the club watches the workload of several pitchers.
 
Up next
The two-game series concludes on Wednesday night. Jerad Eickhoff (8-12, 3.91) opposes right-hander James Shields (5-15, 5.98).

Phillies will take a peek at Tim Tebow, mostly out of curiosity

Phillies will take a peek at Tim Tebow, mostly out of curiosity

CHICAGO — The Phillies will send a scout to watch Tim Tebow’s baseball showcase next Tuesday in Los Angeles.

Now, before you start clearing a space in your closet for a red-pinstriped Tebow jersey — you know, right next to the midnight green Tebow jersey — keep this in mind: the Phillies, and every other team that stops by Tebow’s workout, are merely practicing due diligence by taking a look at an accomplished athlete who long ago showed some baseball aptitude. Tebow’s chances of ever playing in a major-league game are extremely thin.

The former Heisman Trophy winner and two-time national championship quarterback from the University of Florida has not played baseball since 2005, his junior year in high school. He has been training as a baseball player for several months in Arizona. Next week’s showcase was arranged by Tebow’s representatives. Southern California is loaded with amateur baseball talent so many scouts live there. It makes sense that most teams would have a set of eyes on hand for curiosity if nothing else.

Tebow, who turned 29 earlier this month, was a left-handed hitting outfielder/pitcher in high school. He hit .494 with four homers and 30 RBIs as a junior at Nease High School in Ponte Vedra, Florida, before giving up baseball to focus on football. That was a good move as he enjoyed a storied run at Florida. But Tebow has not been able to stick in the NFL.

Tebow played for the Denver Broncos in 2010 and 2011 and the New York Jets in 2012. He attended training camp with the Eagles in 2015, but failed to make the team. He spent last year working as a broadcaster for ESPN.

Obviously, Tebow’s competitive juices still run hot. His athletic résumé alone will attract scouts to his baseball showcase, which, by the way, will be closed to the public.

Prosecutor says he doesn't believe Jerry Sandusky accuser's claim

ap-jerry-sandusky.jpg
AP

Prosecutor says he doesn't believe Jerry Sandusky accuser's claim

BELLEFONTE, Pa. -- A former Pennsylvania prosecutor testified Tuesday he does not believe a man who reached a settlement with Penn State over a molestation claim is the same person seen by a witness being abused by Jerry Sandusky in a university football team shower.

Joe McGettigan, a former prosecutor who is now a lawyer in private practice, took the stand as the final witness during three days of testimony in Sandusky's bid for dismissal of charges or a new trial.

McGettigan said his opinion about the man who claims to be the person described as Victim 2 in court records is based on changes in the man's story, that he appears too old to be the boy in the shower and that he did not provide certain details to investigators until after the man who witnessed the attack had given his own story in open court.

Sandusky's grounds for appeal include a claim that McGettigan lied when he said during closing argument that Victim 2 was known "to God but not to us."

McGettigan said he did not believe the man's claim to be Victim 2 at the time of Sandusky's 2012 trial.

"I did not then and I do not now," McGettigan said.

Graduate assistant Mike McQueary has testified he saw Sandusky abusing a boy inside a team shower late on a Friday night in early 2001, and reported the matter to then-head coach Joe Paterno and other top administrators.

Sandusky was convicted of 45 counts of abuse of 10 boys after eight of them testified against him -- but not Victim 2.

McGettigan said the man who settled with Penn State was born in 1987, so he would have been about 14 at the time, but McQueary described Victim 2 as being about 10. McGettigan said the man was unable to properly describe the location of the attack and drew a map of a locker room that was not accurate.

The man denied to police in September 2011 that any abuse occurred and gave the same statement to an investigator working for Sandusky's lawyers. But after McQueary testified in a related preliminary hearing, he hired a lawyer and changed his story, claiming to have been sexually abused. Neither the man nor Penn State has disclosed the precise nature of his claim against the university or said how much he was paid to settle it.

McGettigan said Sandusky, who attended all three days of the Post-Conviction Relief Act hearing, "could at any time have told any number of persons" the identity of Victim 2. "He declined to say so."

Another former state prosecutor, Jonelle Eshbach, testified that her office set up a sting after a March 2011 story in The Patriot-News of Harrisburg disclosed details of the grand jury investigation that led to Sandusky's arrest about seven months later.

She and her supervisor, Frank Fina, placed a fake notice within the prosecution agency's file about someone who had been subpoenaed and then watched to see if it would produce a story that would indicate a leak within the attorney general's office. She said no one took the bait.

Fina, the third person to testify Tuesday, said his doubts about the man's claim to be Victim 2 were based in part on early questions about when the McQueary incident occurred. At first, it was publicly reported to be 2002, which the man confirmed. Later it was determined to have been 2001.

"There was a possibility that (he) had conformed his testimony to Mr. McQueary's recollection of the date," Fina said.

Sandusky previously lost direct appeals to the state's Supreme and Superior courts. The current process, presided over by the trial judge, is under the Post-Conviction Relief Act and therefore limited to newly discovered evidence, constitutional violations and ineffective lawyering.

The judge did not say when he would rule but indicated there may be additional proceedings.