Notes on the Union's Tough Loss in Toronto

Notes on the Union's Tough Loss in Toronto

Our man Rev reviews last night's tough loss for us. These are his words.

The soccer gods must’ve been held up at the border, because the Union certainly deserved a better fate last night. Following a straight red to Danny Califf in the 34th minute the Union were forced to play down a man for 60+ minutes in an hard luck 2-1 loss to Toronto. A loss is a loss, is a loss, but under the circumstances I thought the Union played fairly well. It’s just unfortunate, and somewhat amazing, that in their three games they’ve played down a man approximately 40% of the time. They’ve got to find a way to finish games with eleven players on the field.

Truth be told though, were it not for the E-6 on Chris Seitz on the Dwayne De Rosario goal on the free kick following Califf’s red card the Union were in line to earn a point, which would have been a fine result.  Instead they have to wait until they play again next Saturday in order to put this loss behind them.

As expected Peter Nowak went with the same starting eleven as last week in the home opener against D.C. They again came out in a 4-4-2 with Seitz between the sticks, Jordan Harvey, Micahel Orozco, Danny Califf, and Cristian Arrieta in the back four, Roger Torres, Andrew Jacobson, Stefani Miglioranzi, and Fred in the midfield, with Alejandro Moreno and Sebastien Le Toux up top. I’ll give you some general impressions and observations before getting into an analysis of how each Union player fared.

  • It was nice to see Max Bretos handling studio duties for ESPN. Since moving over from Fox Soccer Channel I’ve really only seen him on ESPNEWS. I know he rubs some people the wrong way, but I’ve always enjoyed him, particularly his over-enunciation of Spanish names.
  • Everything started well for the Union as they had the better of the possession early on. They drew two early yellow cards on Toronto, including a crunching tackle by Raivis Hscanovics against Arrieta, which could have been a straight red. It was just an ugly tackle.
  • They played another well conceived short corner resulting in a chance from distance by Jacobson. To me that’s a sign of a disciplined team who works on set pieces in training. On the opposite end of the spectrum they need to do a better job defending corners. Marking has been lax resulting in too many good chances. They’re going to give up a goal on one of these soon.
  • The Harvey goal was a thing of beauty. The Union have showed they can score in transition. This instance was all the more impressive considering they were down a man at the time. From the time Fred won the ball at his own 18 the Union strung together six passes as Harvey made an 80+ yard run to get on the end of the Torres pass. I thought this would have been a backbreaking goal, down a man, in stoppage time…I guess not.
  • As commenter MikeB pointed out in the game thread (fyi – I was beyond thrilled there was a game thread) the decision to take Roger Torres off and introduce Shavar Thomas into the game was questionable at best, and damaging at worst. Nowak has done a fine job thus far, but it’s fair to call into question a number of his decisions here in the early going (starting David Myrie, playing Orozco, Toni Stahl, and Danny Mwanga out of position against Seattle – somewhat necessitated by the Fred suspension, and last night’s decision to bring in Thomas).

We’ll take the player analysis from the backline forward.

  • Seitz – another rocky game for the keeper. Obviously, spilling the De Rosario free kick was a huge mistake. That cannot happen from your #1 goalie. It’s as simple as that. He was whistled for the penalty which led to the game winning PK by De Rosario. It was encouraging to see him come off his line on the play, but I thought he hesitated in making the decision to come out. It was a foul and Toronto deserved the PK. I cannot say I’ve seen a whole lot of improvement from Seitz thus far.
  • Harvey – by far his best game of the season. He ran all night. His overlapping runs were well timed. Scored the Union’s lone goal on a tremendous run from the back to get on the other end of a perfectly weighted cross from Torres. He took the goal well. Oh, and all the more impressive he made that goal scoring run from the back while the Union were down a man.
  • Orozco – aside from an early miscommunication with Seitz played a relatively error-free game. Got forward on occasion just missing a scoring chance off a Torres free kick into the box. Was forced to take control of the back line following Califf getting sent off.
  • Califf – early on combined well with Orozco in shutting down De Rosario. They didn’t give him much space on the ball. Was shocked that the official gave him a straight red. Yes, he played an awful ball back to Seitz and compounded the mistake by fouling de Guzman, but I did not think it warranted a red. He did not impede a clear goal scoring opportunity. He had not been booked or warned prior to that foul. I thought the card was harsh.
  • Arrieta – was phenomenal before they went down a man. Got forward and played a couple of dangerous balls into the box. On multiple occasions he stepped up and picked off passes when the Union played a high line. Was forced to shut down his offensive runs and play conservatively following the Califf red.
  • Torres – he just keeps getting better with each game. Creates so much space for himself with his misdirection. His service was stellar. I was encouraged to see him uncork a shot from distance, despite the fact it was blocked. As mentioned already he played a gorgeous ball to Harvey for the goal. If they’re not negotiating with his Columbian club team to extend his loan they better start.
  • Jacobson – was more involved in the offense than he had been previously. Attempted a couple of shots from distance. Good work rate throughout, particularly when they went down a man.
  • Miglioranzi – honestly, the quietest central midfield player I think I’ve ever seen. He doesn’t stick out (good or bad). Very conservative in his play. Not a bruising holding midfielder, and not a string puller either. Perhaps there are subtleties to his game I am missing?
  • Fred – he’d probably be my man of the match. Unbelievable skill and patience on the ball. Gets out of incredibly tight spaces. So calm. Was singlehandedly responsible for jumpstarting the transition on the Harvey goal. There is no panic in his game. He’s really fun to watch.
  •  Moreno – was also instrumental in setting up Harvey’s goal thanks to some nice combination play with Le Toux. Drew an early foul resulting in a yellow on Usanov. Once again, being forced to play down a man forced him into chase-mode and was not given the opportunity to check back and hold up play.
  • Le Toux – had a snap header on goal in the 49th minute thanks to a tremendous cross into the box by Torres. Ran tirelessly all night. Withdrew into a midfield role in the second half as they tried to hang on for the tie. He’s just a skilled, hardworking, versatile player.

SUBSTITUTES

  • Shavar Thomas – here is a direct quote from my notes “55th minute defensive sub for Torres.  Sees yellow in the 57th minute. Good to see he channeled his inner-Myrie. “ He was brutal in his  first appearance for the Union. Nowak’s decision to take Torres off was made all the worse by  Thomas’s performance. They are clearly lacking depth in the back.
  • Amobi Okugo – played around 20 minutes or so. Did nothing to warrant criticism or praise.

 Again, this being an expansion side I am trying to be realistic in my assessment. I thought this was a total 180˚ - in a good way – from the way they played down a man against Seattle. Obviously Toronto is not as quality a side as Seattle, but I was incredibly impressed with them and thought they had the better of play. They do not play again until next Saturday night when they travel to northern New Jersey to take on the Red Bulls. Hopefully they figure out a way to keep all eleven men on that brand new field up there. 

Photos by  Abelimages / Getty Images

Was Roy Halladay's perfect game really seven years ago?

Was Roy Halladay's perfect game really seven years ago?

Where were you seven years ago today? I'd put my money on a number of Phillies fans spending their Saturday of Memorial Day weekend 2010 lounging out on the beach at the Jersey Shore just as I was.

But that night — just 14 miles from where the Phils will take on the now-Miami Marlins tonight — Roy Halladay tossed just the second perfect game in Phillies history, striking out 11 Marlins en route. Yes, that was the same Halladay who earned 55 wins over the course of four seasons in Philadelphia and pitched a no-hitter that same season against the Cincinnati Reds in the opening game of the NLDS.

It was a magical night at Dolphin Land Shark Sun Life Stadium. Anyone who wasn't watching the Flyers lose Game 1 of the Stanley Cup Final to the Chicago Blackhawks, 6-5, probably remembers Shane Victorino tracking down Wes Helms' deep fly to dead center as well as the incredible game called by Carlos Ruiz behind the plate. And then there's the 27th out as third baseman Juan Castro cooly collected the Ronny Paulino ground ball, spun and fired to Ryan Howard at first base.

So what's Doc doing now you ask?

Well, if his Twitter is any indication, Halladay has not stepped too far away from the game of baseball. During the weekend, he posted a series of tweets with his son Braden's high school baseball team, Cavalry Christian (Clearwater, Florida), as they completed a perfect 30-0 season and won the Florida 4A state title with Halladay as one of the team's assistant coaches.

He also tweeted to honor fellow Phillie Jim Bunning — the only other Phillies pitcher to ever throw a perfect game — after the baseball legend died Friday night at the age of 85.

End to End: Who's the better fit for Flyers, Nico Hischier or Nolan Patrick?

End to End: Who's the better fit for Flyers, Nico Hischier or Nolan Patrick?

Throughout the offseason, we’ll ask questions about the Flyers to our resident hockey analysts and see what they have to say.
 
Going End to End today are CSNPhilly.com producers/reporters Tom Dougherty, Jordan Hall and Greg Paone.
 
The topic: Who would be a better fit for the Flyers, Nolan Patrick or Nico Hischier?
 
Dougherty
I don’t believe either one would necessarily be a better fit than the other for the Flyers. This is a case where either player matches what the orange and black need: a top-six centerman. It’s safe to say with either Hischier or Patrick, they will come away from Chicago with a substantial piece they can add to their puzzle. I’ve felt they needed another lottery forward.
 
They’re getting one now, but which player would I prefer to see as a Flyer? That would be Patrick because, for me, he’s the safer bet who is closer to the NHL than Hischier. Now, I don’t believe the Flyers should draft based on who will be here quicker. That would be asinine. But it sure wouldn’t hurt to see either one of them in Philadelphia next season.
 
Patrick has been atop the rankings for this class for two years now. He dominated the WHL as a 17-year-old two years ago, and despite injuries last season, he still ruled play. Plus it’s hard not to be enamored with Patrick’s size. At 6-foot-3, 198 pounds, he’s a big right-handed pivot. Hischier is listed at 6-foot, 176 pounds. He’ll have to get stronger.
 
That’s not saying Patrick doesn’t need to add more muscle to his frame, but at 6-3, 198, he has a solid frame that should be able to handle the wear-and-tear of an NHL season. Sure, he does have some durability questions, but it’s not to the Joel Embiid level of concern.
 
Both players play a solid 200-foot game, which is something GM Ron Hextall preaches. Neither is deficient in his own zone. Patrick is more of a physical player than Hischier. The Brandon center has a solid combination of speed, power and skill, which is attractive.
 
Hischier has many of the same traits as Patrick, but he’s the flashier of the two. Ultimately, this is a discussion for the Devils more than the Flyers. New Jersey has to decide which one they want, and then the Flyers get the other. From afar, Hischier seems more of a fit to what the Devils need and factor in his rise over the last few months, I think he’ll be a Devil.
 
And that means Patrick will be a Flyer. Which is perfectly fine with me.

Hall
If I had to pick, I think the Flyers need more of a player like Hischier than Patrick.
 
The good thing is they can't go wrong with either 18-year-old.
 
Hischier seems to come with a higher ceiling offensively and greater potential to put up star numbers at the center position. The playmaking ability is what changes games and the teams that score are the teams that win.
 
"He's such a strong offensive player, he's completely fearless — you cannot intimidate him," Cam Russell, the general manager of Hischier's junior club, the Halifax Mooseheads, said (see story). "If you watch him play closely, you'll see that he's the first one on the puck and I've never seen a player roll off hits like he does in the corner. I can't think of a time when he was run over or contained in the corner, he's just so strong, so quick and so agile with the puck."
 
What's really appealing about Patrick is you know what you're getting: a proven two-way center that focuses on defense just as much as offense. He'll bring everything to the table and he looks to be the safer pick.
 
He has "elite" potential, too, in his own right.
 
"He won't let anybody down," Grant Armstrong, the general manager of Patrick's junior club, the Brandon Wheat Kings, said. "I just think he's an elite talent with an elite sense for the game. At some point, he'll be a great two-way centerman in the league."
 
So, the Flyers are in an excellent spot. I'd like to see Hischier fall to the Flyers, but Patrick should excite fans, as well.
 
And the funny thing is the Flyers won't have to decide between the two.

Paone
Let's get this part out of the way before I go deeper into this question: both Patrick and Hischier are great fits for the Flyers.

Both are impact forwards who should be able to help sooner rather than later. And with the way the Flyers struggled offensively last season, that's just what the doctor ordered. So they really can't go wrong here and, as I said on Sunday, I do feel it comes down to simplest terms as the Flyers should take whomever New Jersey doesn't out of Patrick and Hischier.

But this question is about the better fit between the two.

Let's think about it this way: We all have a bunch of t-shirts that fit, but we all have that one t-shirt that fits just right. And when we're in a pinch and need something to wear, we always go back to that t-shirt that fits just right.

And the "just right" fit here for the Flyers is Hischier.

The guy just brings an energy to the ice when you see him play. He has a dynamic way to him that when you watch him play, your eyes are just drawn to him. So many times last season the Flyers seemed so lethargic and slogged through periods and games. They needed an energy boost. Hischier can help bring that needed jolt.

On top of that, the high offensive ceiling for Hischier has to appeal to the Flyers, as Jordan said above. That's just what they need. Nothing against Patrick, seen as more of the two-way player. But the two-way center has been the Flyers' preferred way of thinking for so long now. Nothing against a two-way center, but the Flyers need more of a dynamic, playmaking center and Hischier is that. It's time for something different.

The Flyers are going to get a darn good player at No. 2 no matter what, but Hischier is the better fit here and now.