Foles got big-game experience in high school

usa-nick-foles-eagles.jpg

Foles got big-game experience in high school

“After watching the game today, I'm a Nick Foles believer 100 percent. If he keeps working hard and getting better, that kid’s going to make millions in the NFL.”

That’s not a quote following Nick Foles’ performance against the Raiders or Bears this year. It’s not from Foles’ career with the Eagles at all. It’s not even from his college career.

It’s an anonymous post made by somebody going by “Texasfrog” on a Texas high school football message board on Dec. 24, 2006.

Seven years ago this week. And just a few hours after Foles’ final high school football game.

Foles, then a senior at Austin Westlake High School, completed 24 of 43 passes for 299 yards and two touchdowns with no interceptions that day against the No. 1-ranked high school team in the U.S., Southlake Carroll.

Westlake led 15-7 early, but Carroll rallied for a 43-29 win to take the Class-5A championship before about 30,000 fans at the Alamodome in San Antonio.

Who says Foles has never played in a big game?

On Sunday night in Arlington, Texas, about 300 miles north of San Antonio, Foles will play in an even bigger game.

Eagles-Cowboys. Playoff berth at stake.

“State championship in Texas is pretty high,” Foles said. “Bowl games are really high, but that was a big game, growing up.

“At the time in my life, I hadn’t been through college football and you’re playing with all the guys you grew up with and on a big stage against at the time … the No. 1 team in the country.

“We ended up losing but we played them really, really well, and that was tough, but all those games that I’ve played in have. I’ve taken a lot from them. Those were the guys I grew up with. It was family. I knew them forever, since I was in elementary school, so that was a special time.”

With 25 touchdowns and just two interceptions, Foles is the NFL’s highest-rated quarterback with a 118.7 passer rating -- third-highest in NFL history.

The Eagles are 8-2 this year when he’s played more than a half, 1-4 when he hasn’t.

But Sunday night will be by far the biggest start of his career. On the road, in front of 80,000 Cowboys fans and a national TV audience, against the only team that shut him down this year, with a playoff berth hanging in the balance.

That’s all.

Foles played in a couple bowl games at Arizona, but he said that Texas state title game seven years ago is the biggest game he’s played so far.

“I remember warming up in that game and just thinking, ‘This is a dream come true,’" Foles said after practice Thursday.

“To be playing varsity high school football in the state of Texas for Westlake High School and be playing for a state championship, that was a dream.

“And the thing about that season, the beginning of the season, we had a lot of adversity that went on with the team and the players and injuries and stuff like that, so it was how we got there. We didn’t always play well, but we turned it on in the playoffs and we stuck together as a team.

“Sort of like this year. We didn’t start out very well, [but we] started to figure each other out, new identities and stuff like that. You stick together and you believe in each other and you play for each other, and that’s how it was my senior year at Westlake. We believed in each other and we fought for each other.”

Foles played in two bowl games while at Arizona: the Holiday Bowl vs. Alex Henery and Nebraska in San Diego following the 2009 season, and the Alamo Bowl vs. Oklahoma State a year later. The Wildcats lost those two games by a combined 69-10.

Foles was just 6 for 20 for 28 yards and an interception vs. Nebraska and 32 for 50 for 280 yards with a touchdown and three interceptions vs. Oklahoma State.

As big as Texas high school football is and as big as college bowl games are, Sunday night’s game vs. the Cowboys will be the biggest game of Foles’ life.

“It’s great going back to the state of Texas,” he said. “I was born in Austin, I’m a Texas boy.

“It’s great because there’ll be family there, but when I go there, I’m strictly business. It’s time to play football and when I’m in that stadium, I’m going to zone out everything and just focus on that field and focus on playing with my teammates.

“Of course it’s exciting, but I know what’s important and I can’t let the other stuff distract me because I know what’s on the table.”

A win would give the Eagles their first NFC East title and their first playoff berth since 2010 and make Foles the second-youngest quarterback ever to lead the Eagles to the playoffs.

Foles will be about 24 years, 11 months on Sunday. Donovan McNabb was about 23 years, one month, when the 2000 Eagles reached the playoffs as a wild-card.

“It’s pretty much playoffs because if we lose we’re done,” Foles said. “And we don’t want to be done.

“It’s fun, and we want to keep playing football. It is a different game because it is a do-or-die game, and it’s been fun playing with these guys. I’ve enjoyed every moment of it, and I want to keep playing.”

Eagles propose four rules to be considered by NFL next week

Eagles propose four rules to be considered by NFL next week

Next week, when the NFL convenes for its owners meetings in Phoenix, there will be 15 proposed rule changes under consideration by the competition committee. 

While the one proposed rule change would cut regular-season overtime from 15 to 10 minutes (see story), there are 14 others up for discussion. 

Of those 15, seven were submitted by NFL teams. And of those seven, four were submitted by the Eagles

Three of the four rule proposals from the Eagles are safety related. 

Here are the four from the Eagles, per the NFL: 

1. Gives additional protections for long snappers on kick plays. 

2. Prohibits the “leaper” block attempt on field goal and extra point plays. 

3. Expands the “crown of helmet” foul to include “hairline” part of helmet. 

4. Amends the challenge system by granting a third challenge if a club is successful on at least one of its initial two challenges, and expands reviewable plays outside of two minutes of each half.

The first proposed rule would offer long snappers -- Jon Dorenbos included -- some extra protection. It would add this language to Article 6, Unnecessary Roughness: "When a team is in scrimmage kick formation, a defensive player may not initiate contact with the snapper until one second has elapsed after the snap." 

The second proposed rule change is one of the proposals that has garnered the most attention. Basically, the league now allows players to leap over the line of scrimmage on kicks as long as they don't touch anyone. This new rule would completely outlaw the process of leaping over the line. 

It seems like this rule change is likely to happen. The NFLPA has previously asked for this rule to be changed. 

"So the inevitable is going to happen, and just hearing from the players association, Philly now proposing it is really in the best interest of the game," former Eagle and league football operations director Troy Vincent said on a conference call Thursday. 

The next rule does pretty much exactly what it says: it expands the area that is considered to be the "crown of the helmet." 

Here's the new language that would be added to Article 8, Initiating Contact with the Crown of the Helmet: "Lowering the head and making forcible contact with the crown or 'hairline' parts of the helmet against any part of an opponent shall be considered a foul even if the initiating player's head moves after initial contact and the majority of contact occurs with the side or front of the helmet."

Finally, the last proposal isn't a safety one. It's about replay and is pretty self-explanatory for the most part. 

The reasoning given for this rule change on the proposal: "Provides coaches with a greater opportunity to correct subjective officiating errors, but excludes those fouls that have a minimal opportunity for reversal."

NFL owners mull cut of regular-season overtime to 10 minutes

NFL owners mull cut of regular-season overtime to 10 minutes

NEW YORK -- NFL owners will consider proposals next week to cut regular-season overtime from 15 minutes to 10; eliminate players leaping over the line on kick plays; and expansion of coaches' challenges and what can be reviewed by officials.

In what promises to be a busy annual meeting next week in Phoenix that will include discussing the Raiders' potential relocation from Oakland to Las Vegas, the 32 owners also will vote on changing the mechanics on replay reviews and other items intended to reduce downtime during games.

The Eagles proposed four rules changes, including abolishing the leaping techniques that league football operations director Troy Vincent said Thursday "don't belong in the game."

Seattle and Buffalo co-authored a proposal allowing a coach to challenge any officiating decision, whether a foul is called or not.

"That is a significant change to our current replay rule and it is something that will be on the floor and will be debated next week," NFL officiating chief Dean Blandino said.

Another major change would be the reduction of overtime in-season; the extra period in the playoffs would remain at 15 minutes. The powerful competition committee, of which Vincent and Blandino are members, believed it's a player safety issue, noting that number of snaps for games going to OT -- especially deep into the overtime -- is excessive. Especially if a team has a quick turnaround.

"We don't know where a team is going to be playing the next week, it could be four days later," said committee chairman Rich McKay, president of the Atlanta Falcons. "We felt we should put an end to it. We don't think it will lead to more ties. Could it? It could, but we are not concerned with that."

As for changing the format of overtime to ensure both teams always get a possession -- a popular topic after how the Super Bowl ended -- Blandino said the league's wants to keep the element of sudden death in the extra period.

The "leaper rule" has taken some priority among competition committee members, the players' union and coaches. Vincent said coaches have begun scheming how to defense it, which can "create a real safety issue."

"It is really in the best interest of the game" to outlaw leaping on kicks," Vincent added.

McKay noted that the NCAA is in the process of passing a similar ban on the technique.

During the meetings that run from Sunday to Wednesday, the teams will be shown plays the competition committee believes should result in suspensions or ejections. Game officials already have had the leeway to eject players, but it rarely has happened; there were three in 2016.

"They don't happen very often, let's give the players credit," McKay said. "We have 40,000 plays in a year. We'll show a tape that will have four or five plays that would warrant suspension. This is not a widespread situation."

Added Vincent, a former NFL defensive back: "When you see the plays, they are catastrophic. We had two players who did not return for the season. They are high-impact plays that belong out of the game. It will be a real point of emphasis this season."