Did Wilson deserve suspension? Panaccio says yes

slideshow-capitals-tom-wilson-ap.jpg

Did Wilson deserve suspension? Panaccio says yes

I felt Tom Wilson deserved a suspension for his reckless hit on Brayden Schenn. My colleague John Boruk disagrees (see story).

I felt he was like a missile coming in on Schenn from the blue line.

I am convinced Wilson had no intention of trying to get the puck. He wanted Schenn.

If Schenn’s neck had been at a different angle when he went head first into the back boards, he could have suffered a spinal injury.

At some point, that is going to happen, and only then will the NHL devise a constant standard for checking a vulnerable player into the boards.

My point in “Dropping the Gloves” is intent. Wilson intended to destroy Schenn.

NHL Lord of Discipline Brendan Shanahan talked about "intent" in his explanation, but said Wilson’s intent was to hit Schenn and not injure him (see video).

Sherriff Shanny also blamed Schenn for turning into the hit and placing himself in harm’s way.

One thing we have seen consistently from the NHL is there is no consistent standard to what deserves a suspension and what doesn’t. In most cases -- not all -- if the targeted player was severely injured or concussed, the “attacking” player got a suspension.

Schenn was basically unharmed and played Thursday night against Columbus. The league’s Department of Player Safety knew that before it handed down its decision on Wilson.

And I believe that impacted on the decision not to suspend Wilson.

Here’s your comments off Twitter:

Sam Zonshayn @SZonshayn:
There is nothing wrong with skating fast to hit somebody.

-- As Bob Clarke said waaay back in the late 1990s on today’s game: “I was always taught the idea was to get the puck. Separate the man from the puck and get the puck. Now all these guys want to do is hit each other. It’s not about the puck. It’s about the hitting.” What Clarkie said then remains true to this very day even with a different generation of NHLer.

Mike E @mjeike35:
With how dazed schenn was after hit, I cannot believe he was not concussed.

Mike @lhgolfer2000:
Just think if Kaleta delivered that hit. The league would be up in arms.

-- Indeed, Wilson was not a repeat offender, no history to speak of.

Cam Cole @rcamcole:
Big problem with punishing according to injury, not the act: NHL is encouraging victims to fake or play up severity. Getzlaf, Schenn didn't. 

-- It should not take an injury to lead to a suspension. At some point, some day, a player will suffer a permanent spinal injury and only then will we see a change in the league and the player’s association. Both share the blame for now.

Crawford Mackenzie @CrawfordMackenz:
A classic example of watching the play in person vs. the video. In the arena, very clear Wilson made decision to hit earlier.

-- It looked horrific live and in person.

Thom Dennis @THOMPUCKS:
If SCHENN had done that to WILSON he'd get susp/fine. #NHLDBLSTANDARD

-- Actually, if it had been Zac Rinaldo … 10 games.

Robert Caplette @TattooedEnigma:
If they aren't willing to punish an illegal hit with no major injury, they aren't truly trying to rid the game of those hits.

-- No harm, no foul. That’s the simple way to view it, unfortunately.

Darren Kipfer @mvp099:
No way to know, but I felt and said yesterday that it was not a suspendable hit. Saw him coming and turned. Albeit a brutal hit

-- I still felt the intent was there to punish Schenn or whoever had the puck.

Ryan @LeafsHayward:
Flyers are still on the Lindros concussion protocol?

-- Like many fans I was stunned to hear the Flyers’ doctors did not order a concussion test regardless given that Schenn fell to the ice three times and was wobbly. To me, that spells possible concussion. That Schenn later admitted he could not remember full details of what transpired would indicate memory loss, which is attributable to a concussion. And I’m not a neurologist.

Matt Read on Flyers' changes: 'We're running out of time here'

Matt Read on Flyers' changes: 'We're running out of time here'

ST. PAUL, Minn. -- As far as he can remember, in his six years with the Flyers, Matt Read hasn't played on a line with both Claude Giroux and Jakub Voracek.

Read has spent time with each of the Flyers' top-two scorers at various times but never together. The Flyers hope the cohesiveness comes together quickly after making changes to three of the lines on Wednesday in an attempt keep their sagging playoff hopes.

"We're running out of time here, so hopefully a couple line changes here gives us a little spark offensively," Read said. "We've still got to play better defensively, but you know it's kind of do-or-die right now. So hopefully chemistry clicks right away and things can start going off the bat."

Flyers coach Dave Hakstol had hinted at adjusting the lines recently but stuck with the current structure in Tuesday night's 3-2 loss at Winnipeg (see game story). With the ability to practice Wednesday in Minnesota before Thursday's game against the Wild, Hakstol followed through with the adjustment.

Hakstol met with the four centers before practice and then had Giroux with Voracek and Read. Valtteri Filppula centered Jordan Weal and Wayne Simmonds. Pierre-Edouard Bellemare was teamed with Travis Konecny and Chris VandeVelde.

Brayden Schenn, Sean Couturier and Dale Weise stayed together.

"That line, it's been a good line for us," Hakstol said of Schenn, Couturier and Weise. "Off their game a little bit yesterday, but they've been a good line and I'm confident they'll come back and do a good job tomorrow. The other changes are just looking at different things coming off a road performance yesterday… just looking at a way to inject a little bit more into our lineup for a real tough road game here tomorrow night."

The Flyers didn't lose any ground with Tuesday's loss with Boston, Tampa Bay and Carolina also losing. But the Flyers now have just 10 games remaining as they trail Toronto by seven points for the final wild-card spot.

"We didn't take advantage of the opportunity we had for two points," Hakstol said. "At the end of the day, you can't sit back and watch what's happening elsewhere. You've got to take care of your own backyard, and that's what our focus is. We didn't get it done yesterday. Point blank, we didn't get it done. So, we've got an opportunity tomorrow night for two points and that's what our job is."

Reuniting Giroux and Voracek, along with Read, is one way he hopes to solve the issue. Voracek said he knows the onus is on his line to lead the way.

"We know what to expect from each other," Voracek said. "When we move our feet, we are dangerous. So that's what we've got to do. We've got to have fun. We've got to find a way to score the goals and help the team to win the games, because we're going to play a lot of minutes."

Another possible change for Hakstol could come along the defense. Brandon Manning practiced on Wednesday and Hakstol said it's possible he could rejoin the lineup against the Wild.

Manning hasn't played since March 11 because of a right shoulder injury. Hakstol said he's confident Manning is ready and a decision will be made Thursday morning on which of the seven defensemen will play in the game.

"He's practiced well," Hakstol said. "He got extra work in yesterday. He practiced well today. We'll have a decision to make tomorrow."

Flyers-Jets 10 observations: Lackluster effort, wasted opportunity

Flyers-Jets 10 observations: Lackluster effort, wasted opportunity

Our recap of Tuesday's underwhelming performance by the Flyers in Winnipeg.

Their Tragic Number is now 13, meaning the number of points either lost by the Flyers or accrued by the second wild card -- Toronto -- that totals 13 will eliminate the Flyers from the playoffs.

Sean Couturier said it best prior to the road trip: Unless the Flyers won in Winnipeg, then anything positive they achieved in coming from behind to beat Carolina was wasted.

And it was.  

If you watched the telecast with John Boruk, Alfonso Morganti and myself, you already know how I feel about the loss.

But for those of you who are gluttons for further punishment, here's 10 Things I think, I think, as Bill Lyon used to say:

1. A couple players gave everything they had to make a difference in this game. Radko Gudas had eight of the Flyers' 17 hits. Michael Del Zotto had five strong shots from the point, two of which were almost goals. Shayne Gostisbehere had four shots, two of which almost gave them a goal.

2. The Jets had five injured defensemen out of their lineup, which meant the Flyers' forwards should have been attacking them at the net. Again, the only offense generated for 50 minutes was from the point and not down low, where the Jets were vulnerable.

3. Valterri Filppula matched up against Patrick Laine and held him -- with help from Steve Mason -- to no points, a task in itself. Laine generated five shots and two prime scoring chances that Mason took care of.

4. Jets rookie defenseman Julian Melchiori had played just eight NHL games and had a total of four shots. He had three in the first period alone Tuesday and tied Laine with a team-high five for the game. He was more determined to make something happen than most of the Flyers. That should embarrass coach Dave Hakstol, who insisted the Flyers come out strong. They didn't.

5. Winnipeg moved up and down the ice well in transition. They came into the zone with speed and spread their attack out. Blake Wheeler's goal that made it 2-1 in the third period was the result of the Jets' precise puck movement from Mathieu Perreault to Mark Scheifele to Wheeler that demonstrated nothing moves faster on the ice than the speed of the puck. Wheeler got the puck with a wide-open look inside the right circle. The Flyers didn't have a single play during the game that mimicked that rush.

6. Although the Flyers' penalty kill units gave up a 10th goal in their last 24 chances, they shut down the Jets' the final four power plays of the game, including the four-minute double-minor to Ivan Provorov in the second period. The PK got no help from the power play (0 for 3).

7. Mason had four saves during the Jets' four-minute power play, which should have given the Flyers some momentum for the remainder of the second period and into the third. He also had a terrific stick save on Laine in the slot after the PP that left the rookie so angry he was jamming his stick violently into the ground on the Jets' bench.

8. Following up on that, why were the Flyers hesitant in the third period, tied 1-1, while the Jets peppered Mason at the outset? Where's that sense of desperation Hakstol's team should have shown? This is precisely what happened in Boston a few weeks ago. Game tied going into the third and instead of playing for two points they absolutely had to have, the Flyers were playing to get the game into overtime and earn at least one. That strategy failed spectacularly in Boston when the Bruins won the game in the final 5.6 seconds of regulation and failed again Tuesday.

9. Hakstol talked about effort and determination, yet the numbers say otherwise. With 13:34 left in regulation, the Flyers had just two shots in the period. Two! In the final seven minutes of the game, their sense of urgency finally kicked in when they kept the puck in Winnipeg's zone to the end and even scored shorthanded. That again raises this question: Where was that urgency at the period's start when it was 1-1 and not 3-1?

10. Finally, the Flyers had three power plays in this defeat. During their second power play, trailing 2-1, Winnipeg's lowly PK unit generated two shorthanded chances and cleared the zone four times. On the Flyers' final power play -- they trailed 3-1 at that point -- Hakstol pulled Mason to create a 6-on-4. The Flyers generated several scoring chances. They have scored three times this season under that scenario. Young goalie Michael Hutchinson, who had a 4.06 goals against average head-to-head against the Flyers, had a couple of terrific saves, including one on Wayne Simmonds in the slot. Where was that pressure on Hutchinson earlier in the period? Or earlier in the game?