Union have options in draft with two late picks

900345.jpg

Union have options in draft with two late picks

In a change from their previous three trips to the youth talent pool, the Union are entering Thursdays 2013 MLS SuperDraft in Indianapolis as virtual spectators.

Trading away the No. 5 overall selection to the Vancouver Whitecaps to move up in the MLS Allocation Order to sign Bakary Soumare in 2012, the Union left themselves with the 26th and 29th selections of the second round -- a fact that will force coach John Hackworth into some creative maneuvering.

A first-round pick has value and from that regard, we don't want to necessarily not have one, Hackworth told Dave Zeitlin of MLSsoccer.com. But I think we have enough flexibility right now to either move up or down. There will be a lot of negotiating.

Should the Union decide to trade up into the first round, one strategy could be to bring in an MLS-ready left back. With Gabe Farfan interested in returning to his natural midfield position, Georgetowns Jimmy Nealis could be a proper replacement. Considered the top left back in the draft, the six-foot Nealis has a strong all-around game as a natural left back and is a playmaker to boot.
Another option at left back is Taylor Kemp out of Maryland. Touted to have a fantastic left foot an ability to eat minutes right away, the 5-foot-11 Kemp could be on the Unions radar as a two-way player. Injuries limited the Maryland senior in 2012, which could cause his stock to drop right into the Unions lap.

Other options at left back that may not require the Union to trade up would be John Gallagher out of Penn State and Dylan Remick from Brown.

Its a ton of options to have two picks in the second round, said Hackworth. Whether we target a player we think will be taken in the first round, it gives us the potential to trade up. Or, if thats not necessary for us and we think there are two players available that we really want, we can select those.

One advantage the Union have over most teams is their proximity to Premier Development League and USL club, Reading United. Headed by Brendan Burke, who is also an assistant coach for the Union, Hackworth has direct insight into the many college talents that pass through Reading on their way to the MLS.

United names that are expected to go in the draft and could also have the Union intrigued are forward Paul Wyatt, defender Eric Schoenle, goalkeeper Scott Goodwin, midfielder Jose Gomez, striker Ryan Finley, defender Greg Cochrane, midfielder Ian Christianson, forward Deshorn Brown and forward Will Bates.

We believe that Reading United is an essential part of our player development and scouting structure, Hackworth said in a team release. Obviously with Brendan (Burke), we work very closely with Reading.

However, while the option to move up in the draft will keep Hackworth on his toes, should the club decide to stand with the 26th and 29th picks, all wouldnt be lost. The Union tend to succeed when it comes time to finding diamonds in the draft rough.

Arguably the Unions most exciting young player is midfielder Michael Farfan, who was drafted in the second round -- 23rd overall -- in 2011. Drafted 35th overall in the second round of the 2012 draft, defender Ray Gaddis came out of nowhere to open eyes last season with his poise and speed at full back. Striker Antoine Hoppenot was a another uncovered success story, as he was picked up in the third round of the MLS Supplemental Draft.

Hopefully we can pull that off again, Hackworth said. I think there are some players out there that may not be on the top of everyones list and may be a player that could help us. But well have to see how that goes with the other teams. Certainly its a little bit unique in that well have to wait around and see how some of these things play themselves out.

Regardless of where the Union will pick, its what position they choose that counts. And as of now, the roster void Hackworth wants to fill is still a mystery. Even to him.

That depends on who is available, Hackworth said. We feel like we have addressed our positional needs already this offseason, but we still have a few spots where we would like to add depth. If a player is still available that we really like and he fits one of those specific spots, great. If there is a player who we really like no matter what, we could go that way as well.

E-mail Ryan Bright at ryanbright13@gmail.com.

Is it time to reshuffle the Union's back line?

Is it time to reshuffle the Union's back line?

On Tuesday night, the Union's promising back four of Giliano Wijnaldum, Joshua Yaro, Richie Marquez and Keegan Rosenberry all took the field together and led their team to a shutout.

The only problem: that team was the Union's USL affiliate, Bethlehem Steel FC. And they did it at a baseball complex in Harrisburg.

How did it happen that such a talented group of young MLS players have essentially been relegated to the minor leagues to get game minutes? It was only last season, after all, that Rosenberry was the MLS Rookie of the Year Runner-Up, Marquez was being viewed as a potential US national team center back, and Yaro was perhaps the best player in the entire 2016 draft. And adding some offseason pop, Wijnaldum was certainly an intriguing left back prospect from the Netherlands.

But what looked to be the Union’s starting defense in the preseason is now Bethlehem’s starting defense as Ray Gaddis, Oguchi Onyewu and Jack Elliott charged their way into the lineup a few weeks back while Fabinho has refused to let go of his long-standing left back role.

And the backline may not be changing anytime soon, even as the Union’s three-game losing streak has sent them tumbling to the bottom of the Eastern Conference ahead of Saturday’s game vs. rival D.C. United at Talen Energy Stadium (6ABC, 7 p.m.).

“I don’t think we have a back four issue,” Union head coach Jim Curtin insisted during his weekly press conference. “We have a team that needs to do a little bit better offensively and be a little bit cleaner with some defensive issues as well. But overall I don’t think there’s a real problem with us conceding a ton of goals.”

As proof, Curtin pointed to the fact the Union have allowed only six goals in their last eight league games, four of which have come over the last two contests with influential midfielder Alejandro Bedoya out of the lineup (and two coming in last week’s loss to the Red Bulls while the Union were down a man).

One of the big reasons for the team’s stinginess has been the surprisingly steady play of Elliott, a rookie from England who in the past few months has gone from late-round draft pick to preseason afterthought to stalwart starter.

And he’s well aware that two of the team’s most hyped prospects — Marquez and Yaro — are waiting in the wings behind him, ready to take their jobs back.

“That doesn’t add pressure,” Elliott said. “It’s good to have that competition there to always keep you on the top of your game. It’s the same with all of the center backs here. We all push each other to be better players and we just have to keep the team going. We know if one of us went down, another one can step in.”

Injuries did in fact force Marquez and Yaro to enter the game on June 3 at New York City FC, but Elliott and Onyewu regained their spots the following game vs. the Red Bulls.

It’s a unique pairing with an unheralded rookie (Elliott) teaming up with a one-time American soccer legend creeping up in age (Onyewu), but it has been working well.

“We have a good understanding of how each other plays and our strengths,” Elliott said. “We’ve played a good seven, eight games together and we found a balance. You see over the last eight games, we haven’t conceded many.”

While the Onyewu-Elliott pairing certainly has been effective, it always seemed like a short-term fix to help stabilize a defense that got off to a rough start this year. The same can be said with Gaddis supplanting Rosenberry, who brings more of an attacking presence to the flank.

So even though the back four as currently constructed might not be the team’s biggest issue at the moment, it’s fair to ask why they’d get the benefit of the doubt when at least some may not be a big part of the team’s future? If three straight losses don't put the team’s top young players back into the lineup, what will? And how will continuing to come off the bench or play in Bethlehem affect their development?

For now, it seems, like Curtin is putting everyone on equal footing, regardless of age, where they were drafted, or which guys were the most hyped last year.

“I don’t think there’s a big drop-off or difference with all eight [defenders], to be honest,” the Union coach said. “It’s good to have these issues, to have a lot of good players to draw from. We had a hard film session but concluded in our last eight, we’ve given up six goals. We can build on that.

“And it does start with defense in this league. You look at teams at the top of the standings in each conference and they defend their butts off for 90 minutes. We’ve been able to do it in patches in games but we’ve just been too inconsistent.”

Maybe, then, it’s time for another change.

Union on Derrick Jones' red card: 'It killed our game'

Union on Derrick Jones' red card: 'It killed our game'

CHESTER, Pa. -- Without hesitation, referee Allen Chapman changed Sunday’s match.

“It killed our game,” Union captain Haris Medunjanin admitted.

Looking to put out a New York Red Bulls fast break caused by a turnover in the 53rd minute at Talen Energy Stadium, rookie midfielder Derrick Jones sliced in on Felipe with the intention of separating the ball from the player.

The attempt led to a screaming Felipe crashing to the grass. 

“Derrick has to leave his feet for the tackle,” said Union manager Jim Curtin, whose club has lost three straight games (see game story). “Derrick does tackle over the ball, but he doesn’t really touch Felipe. You can get into all kinds of different arguments on the call, but obviously, red cards change games.”

And it changed Sunday’s game in a big way. Chapman immediately whipped out the straight red card for what was deemed violent conduct, ejecting Jones, who was unavailable for comment after the game.

“You would like to see the referee maybe pause, take a deep breath and think about it,” Curtin said. “Not just be so quick to show the red.”

Despite tilting the field against the Red Bulls in the first half, the Union were forced on their heels in the second as a result of the call. And with the temperature exceeding 90 degrees on the field, it was a bad mix for a Union team looking for points.

As a result, Bradley Wright-Phillips eventually wore the Union defense down, scoring twice in the 87th and again in stoppage time for the 2-0 victory.

“When you play with 10 men against Red Bull, it’s always difficult,” Medunjanin said. “We kept defending until they scored the goal and after that, it was difficult to come back.”

Union defender Jack Elliott felt the same.

“It’s a hot day and the sending off really hurt us,” he said. “We were keeping the ball well in the first half and created a few chances. Even with 10 men, we could’ve nicked a goal but in the end, the heat really got to us with 10 men.” 

Because of how the call dramatically changed the match, Medunjanin spoke clearly about what he saw. He was one of the few Union players who admitted to watching a replay of the red card. 

“I just saw it and I don’t think it’s a red card,” he said. “Jonesy went for the ball and with a player like Felipe who likes to jump, I think everybody saw it was not a red card. It was the first card in the game and he gave directly a red card. It was not even on the leg. He went for the ball and I don’t think he even touched him.”