Mailbag: More on Eagles Draft

Mailbag: More on Eagles Draft

Reader Alison writes in to point out the poll on asking what position the Eagles should address with their first pick.  Not surprisingly, QB didn't make the list.

Reader George writes in from Boston with a nice long rant on the Eagles as a business.  He starts:

Something that I'm reminded of today is that pro sports is above all a business. I'm thinking of this as I reflect on the Eagles draft. I'm a displaced Philly fan living in Boston, working in finance, so I 'get it.' That doesn't mean that I have to like it. There's essentially two ways to run a business, one is for growth and the other is for cash. Running a business for cash is often perceived as the safe play.

The rest of his rant after the jump.

Once the business is established, it doesn't reinvest a lot of capital, maximizes profitability, generates a steady stream of income and cash flow, and so long as none of its competitors are really out-executing it or taking significant market share, the business can continue to hum along and make money for a long time. Eventually, however, many of these businesses either get diplaced by more agile or more innovative competitors, or by larger companies that have better scale and lower costs.   

   Running a business for growth is more risky. The growth business reinvests a lot of its earnings and cash in R&D or sales capacity to grow the business. It looks to make strategic acquisitions, and sometimes chooses to go into debt, potentially betting the future for opportunities that are available today. There is inherantly more risks to the growth strategy. A company could make bad investments, R&D could bear no fruit and acquisitions can carry significant integration and execution risk. And often, growth strategies fail and companies go bankrupt. But sometimes they don't, and we get a General Electric, a Microsoft or an Apple. From an investment perspective, investors like cash, but they pay up for and lust for growth. Why? because one dollar is always worth one dollar, but the dream of what one dollar invested today could be worth tomorrow, next month or next year is a big part of what makes this country go. Everyone wishes they'd invested that dollar in Microsoft in 1990.

nbsp;   While the Eagles might appear to be in growth mode, from a business analysis perspective they are obviously in running the business for cash. By trading down and drafting for the future, the Eagles are conservatively choosing to sit on cash as opposed to making capital investments that could help the team win now. Moving down in the draft lowers their total cash outlay required to sign their total draftees, lowering capital expenses and total reinvestment rate. Strategic acquisitions in recent years seem to have been small and anything but risky. The Eagles have been running the franchise under the salary cap for years, maximizing profit margins at the expense of innovation and improving their competitive position in the market. This has resulted in the Eagles being an above-median performer over the last decade, but having constantly fallen short of absolute success as it is measured in their business segment.

   The company - excuse me, the Eagles - were not always running the business for cash. Reid, Heckert  & Co. used to be an innovative management team. The drafting of Donovan McNabb and the signing of Jon Runyan started the growth cycle. The Eagles were in full growth mode when they acquired Jevon Kearse and TO, and drafting players that could potentially make a positive contribution right away. Maybe that experience has left the management team more conservative, and understandably so. Here's the problem: in the NFL, the future is always now, this season. Business performance gets judged annually. There is no carry over, no running the business for cash, everyone starts anew each year. Yes some of the players are carried over, but every team is remade each season. Every September, each team start with 0 wins and 0 losses before the first coin flip.


    So here's to imploring CEO Jeff Lurie. Jeff, grow the business. Invest, acquire, think strategically. Add valuable assets around your core capabilites. Boldly defend your market position. Bury the competition. Increase the returns for your shareholders, or us fans. See what that dollar in your pocket can be worth in November, December or even in January. Because come that second week in February, that dollar is worth just a dollar.

Eagles-Vikings Week 7: What they're saying

Eagles-Vikings Week 7: What they're saying

Riding a two-game losing streak, the Eagles (3-2) return home Sunday for the first time in nearly a month and welcome a familiar face to the confines of Lincoln Financial Field. 

Sam Bradford and the Vikings (5-0) will come to Philadelphia fresh off a Week 6 bye and, most notably, as the league's lone unbeaten team. Minnesota boasts one of the league's top defenses, ranking first in points allowed (12.6 per game) and second in yards allowed (287.6 per game), and is looking to improve to 6-0 for the first time since 2009.

The last time these two franchises met was back in December 2013, when Matt Cassell and the Vikings put up 48 points in a win over Chip Kelly's Eagles.

To get a better handle on this year's Vikings, here's what they're saying about the Eagles' Week 7 opponent.

Brian Robison poses yet another challenge for Big V
Making his NFL debut in a start against the Redskins last week, Halapoulivaati Vaitai struggled mightily. Ryan Kerrigan beat Vaitai and got to Carson Wentz for 2½ sacks, all of which came in the first half.

It won't get any easier for the rookie right tackle this week either, as he'll likely be lined up against Brian Robison for most of the afternoon. Robison has four sacks and two forced fumbles on the season and, according to Andrew Krammer of the Star Tribune, the versatile 10-year defensive end could be difference maker on the defensive side of the ball Sunday.

"Whether his hand is in the turf at left end or he’s standing over a guard or center as the defensive tackle, Robison could be dropping back to cover a tight end or running back," Krammer wrote. "At the line, he’s given responsibilities to call stunts or twists depending on their own play call. Sometimes he’s setting the pick to free another teammate. ... And on Sunday against the Eagles and their rookie right tackle, keep an eye on Robison when he lines up at his traditional spot of left end. All four of his sacks this season, including two strip-sacks, have come from there."

Makeshift offensive line remains a question mark
The Vikings may be undefeated, but by no means are they made up of perfect parts. As the midway point of the NFL season approaches, Minnesota's injury-battered offensive line is still a work in progress. 

Starting tackles Matt Kalil and Andre Smith are both sidelined with season-ending injuries. Starting guard Brandon Fusco suffered a concussion Week 5 against the Texans, but is expected to return against the Eagles. Center is the only position on the line the Vikings haven't had to replace because of an injury at some point this season.

But despite the constant changes up front, Minnesota has been stout overall in protecting the quarterback, allowing eight sacks and 27 quarterback hits across five games. According to Brian Murphy of the Pioneer Press, the performance of that makeshift offensive line is going to be key in the Vikings' potential success down the road. 

"What’s best for Bradford and the Vikings’ standing as the NFC’s top dog is better pass protection," Murphy wrote. "He was sacked twice when Houston defenders turnstiled Clemmings and hit hard in the pocket other times. ... Offensive line intrigue never is a sexy storyline, but how well the Vikings manage the unit week to week figures to be an underlying factor to their continued success."

Strong away from home
The Vikings are a just a few years removed from going winless on the road, finishing 0-7-1 away from home in the 2013 season. Minnesota secured wins in only two of its first 10 away games under the tutelage of Mike Zimmer, but have since gone on a tear.

Minnesota has won seven of its last eight road games dating back to last season and, in their most recent game away from U.S. Bank Stadium, the Vikings took down the Panthers, 22-10, in Week 3. A testament of a true contender is having the ability to win consistently on the road, which holds true with the Vikings.

According to Chris Tomasson of the Pioneer Press, the Vikings' vast improvement over the past two-plus seasons has contributed to them becoming a stronger team away from home.

"Facing a tough opposing crowd once was a tall order for the Vikings, but it’s much less of one now. After being one of the worse road teams in the NFL earlier this decade, they’re now one of the best," Tomasson wrote. "Overall, the Vikings have improved, having gone from 7-9 in 2014 to 11-5 last season to 5-0 this year. That’s the main reason the road record has gotten so much better. Still, players say the continuity the team has had has especially helped when entering rugged road environments."

While Vegas has the Vikings as light favorites on the road, national experts have them heavily favored straight up to hand the Eagles their third straight loss.

ESPN: All nine experts picked the Vikings

CBS Sports: Seven of eight experts picked the Vikings

FOX Sports: Three of five experts picked the Vikings 

Flyers Skate Update: Ivan Provorov has a new partner

Flyers Skate Update: Ivan Provorov has a new partner

Ivan Provorov has a new partner.

Provorov will be paired with Brandon Manning on Saturday night against the Carolina Hurricanes, a changeup from the first four games of the season. Mark Streit drops to the third pair with Nick Schultz, a tandem that worked together most of last season.

"We're going to change them up," Flyers head coach Dave Hakstol said after the team's morning skate. "We're going to look at a couple of different things. Some of the combinations are some familiar ones, such as Streiter-Schultz. They played a lot of minutes together last year. It's a move that we want to take a look at."

The Provorov-Manning pair is an interesting one. It should allow the 19-year-old to activate more in the offensive zone with Manning playing positionally sound. Manning has played with an extra edge thus far, showcasing a far more aggressive brand of hockey than he's shown previously with the orange and black.

With Streit, an offensive-minded blueliner, Provorov had to cover for his partner. Provorov also ran into some tough luck situations, too. Now with Manning, Provorov has the handcuffs off a little bit. Manning plays well positionally and while he has been more aggressive, he knows when to stay back, which will help Provorov.

It's another adjustment for the rookie. Through four games, he said, there haven't been any surprises in terms of his expectations for how the NHL game plays.

"I think what I expected is what I got," Provorov said. "It's the best league in the world, you expect all four lines to be great, you expect fast pace, physical game and that's what I got. I'm still learning, but I'm trying to do better as the games go on."

Provorov has one assist this season and enters Saturday as a minus-5, largely because of the Chicago game Tuesday. Hakstol praised Provorov's maturity level and ability to self-evaluate. What he hasn't done with Provorov is talk about numbers.

"There are some meaning in stats and we take the meaningful areas and apply those," Hakstol said. "But I haven't talked to any of the young guys about their statistics. We're four games in. I don't make too much of statistics right now. We're evaluating day-to-day play and looking at areas that we can use as strengths and areas individually we can improve."

Starting slow
If there has been one common theme through the first four games, it's the Flyers' poor starts. In first periods this season, they've been outscored, 6-1 (see game notes).

On Thursday night, the Flyers again came out of the gates slow. It was their first game back after a season-opening road trip out West, which Jakub Voracek said was a factor.

Voracek, who has four assists, said the burden falls on the individual player to focus on the small details and avoid committing mistakes.

"As a player, if you don't have that extra step, you just have to keep it simple," he said. "It's going to come around. The first 10 minutes, you have to make sure you don't make mistakes and I think that we were trying to do too much if we weren't feeling right. It showed last game against Anaheim. We were a half-a-step slower."

Four games isn't a large enough sample size for Hakstol to make a definite statement on the Flyers' first-period woes. The second-year coach said he'll have a better understanding where his team is at after the Carolina game.

"I think we'll answer that question after the start tonight," Hakstol said. "I think we'll get a fair evaluation of our starts after our start tonight, and if we have a problem, we'll know it after tonight. If we don't, we'll know that as well.

"Pretty clear, crystal clear, black and white in my mind. Tonight should tell else what type of team we are at the start of the hockey game."

Projected Flyers Lineup
F: Brayden Schenn-Claude Giroux-Wayne Simmonds

Travis Konecny-Sean Couturier-Jakub Voracek

Nick Cousins-Pierre-Edouard Bellemare-Matt Read

Chris VandeVelde-Boyd Gordon-Roman Lyubimov

D: Andrew MacDonald-Shayne Gostisbehere

Ivan Provorov-Brandon Manning

Nick Schultz-Mark Streit

G: Steve Mason