So the night is over, the dust has settled, and the Sixers pick appears final: Evan Turner, Ohio State Buckeye and 2010 National Player of the Year, is your newest Philadelphia 76er. (The team had no second-rounder, having traded it to Milwaukee as part of last year's Meeks-Ivey blockbuster). In his post-draft team grade column, I was afraid that ESPN draft guru Chad Ford would rip the Sixers for taking a player so similar to Andre Iguodala, the possibility of which he had previously tut-tutted, but Ford actually complimented the Sixers' decision, giving their draft night an A- grade. Sez Ford:
thrilled. Turner's versatility and ability to lead in big moments are
the stuff that makes players great. His lack of elite athleticism and
his high turnover rate are some cause for concern, but most see him with
similar upside to Brandon Roy.
Of course, Ford does still mention the overlap with Iguodala presenting a likely issue:
ball in their hands. I think it's likely that the Sixers will try to
find a trade for Iguodala this summer. If they can replace him with a
shooter, Turner could be the guy who turns the Sixers back into a
For the record, I would really like to see the Sixers at least give it a try with both Turner and Iguodala. So much of the problem with 'Dre at the team's forefront last year is that he didn't really have anyone on his skill or IQ level to really run with--at least until Jrue's emergence as his playmaking equal late in the season, which seemed to loosen up Iguodala's game considerably and allowed both to thrive. Add Turner to that mix--maybe the smartest player in the draft--as well as a quality passing big man like Hawes, and this could be the team most conducive to 'Dre's point-forward skills that he's ever played with. I'm not saying it's a guaranteed recipe for success--no matter good your team is at sharing the ball, eventually SOMEONE has to put it in the net--but I just want the team give it a chance before we ship of 'Dre to the Celtics or Rockets for 30 cents on the dollar.
Also, I'm surprised Chad doesn't mention it, but I can't help but be the slightest bit disappointed that Turner was the only move the Sixers made last night. There were rumors floating around that Philly was gonna try to buy in to late in the first round, and I was pretty excited at the prospect of them doing so--I thought maybe they could grab one of those project big men who kept slipping out of their projected near-lottery status, like Kentucky's Daniel Orton, South Florida's Solomon Alabi, or Marshall's Hassan Whiteside. Taking a flier on one of those guys to maybe groom into the pivot of the team's future could have been a dice-roll worth throwing, and teams were selling those picks fairly cheap. Oh well--at the very worst, the team did the right thing with their one move, and with this team, "nothing catastrophic" is just about the best compliment you can give for their personnel moves.
Happy as the night was for the Sixers, however, one of Philly's favorite sons was sadly left with his cheese out in the wind. Scottie Reynolds, heroic Villanova combo guard and the face of Big Five basketball for the last two-plus years, was passed over 60 times last night to become the first AP All-American in post-merger history not to get picked by anyone on draft night. We were worried after Reynolds' horrible end to his senior season (Scottie shot a combined 4-26 in Nova's two NCAA games, after feuding with teammate Corey Fisher and receiving a surprise benching from coach Jay Wright) that his stock would slip, but I think most of us were hoping some team would at least take a second-round chance on the college star. In any event, we here at the Level salute Scottie's excellent four years at Nova, and wish him the best of luck in his future endeavors, whether it be in the D-League, overseas, or outside basketball altogether.
Meanwhile, as he does every year, ESPN star fan-analyst Bill Simmons did a Draft Diary column, and it was interesting to see that as a sidebar in this year's edition, Simmons asked Evan Turner's Ohio State teammate Mark Titus to talk a little about Turner's draft night performance. Mostly, he talked about Turner's wardrobe, saying he hoped he'd pull a Lady GaGa with his get-up. Failing that...
his wardrobe, because pretty much nothing about Evan could be described
as "flashy." On the court, the bread and butter of his game is his
midrange jump shot (unexciting yet effective). Off the court, he's a
well-mannered and respectful kid who can be found reading books,
watching film, or working on his game in the gym on weekend nights.
This substance-over-style attitude was reflected last night in demeanor
and dress [...] While Al-Farouq Aminu regrettably wore glasses that made him look like
Squints from "The Sandlot," Evan wore the same prescription glasses that
he's worn for years. These glasses paired with this year's atrocious
draft hats made Evan quite possibly the first top 2 pick in NBA history
to also look like the draft's biggest dweeb.
It's true that Turner's wardrobe, combine with a naturally nasal speaking voice, did kind of give him a certain honors-student / AV Club air. But a final note on that, as well as a message to those who still think we should have taken Favors, the upside pick, over Turner, the safe choice...
The last few years, NBA TV has taken to replaying most of the old drafts from the 80s forward in their entirety. It's fascinating to watch these timestamped NBA portraits for any number of reasons--watching the evolution of ESPN graphics and music, seeing the different hairstyles that Hubie Brown and Doug Collins have gone with over the years, and listening to the sound of teams get super-excited about players and decisions we know never really panned out (John Calipari raving about taking "sure thing" Kerry Kittles over Kobe Bryant in 1996 remaining my all-time favorite) all among them.
My favorite thing, though, is the interviews with the players. It's not usually about the questions asked, or about the answers given--no revelatory information is ever shared in these perfunctory Q&As--but about how the player carries himself in the interview. You don't often see it analyzed as a prospect projection metric, but I swear that more often than not, you can tell who the future pro stars are going to be from how they conduct themselves in these pieces. The best players are quick, thoughtful, engaging, and most importantly, comfortable in their own skin. The eventual busts are dull, rote, fidgety and almost unwatchably awkward. It's not a perfect grading rubric--nobody was more charming in their post-draft interview than the Timberwolves' Isiah "J.R." Rider, and I don't know if you'd exactly say he turned out as hoped--but generally speaking, show a non-NBA fan one of these drafts, and they'll be able to pick out the future building blocks of the league by how they handle Craig Sager and company.
Which brings me to my obvious and perhaps biased point: When it came time for him to do his introductory conference with the press last night, Turner was a stud. He was composed, he was considerate, and he sounded about ten times more comfortable answering my question about his potential status as the Sixers' next real franchise player than I did asking it. (Hey, it was my first time actually piping up in one of those things, cut me some slack.) He sounded knowledgeable about the team, rehearsed in his responses but never robotic. And as he got up to leave, I could hear the other reporters--not all of them Sixers fans, presumably--whispering amongst themselves about what a great kid he was. It was heartwarming, for real. (Btx, John Wall was similarly impressive in his presser, and he and Turner actually shared a nice bro embrace in between interviews that I wish I was quick enough to have gotten a photo of--it could be like that famous Biggie and Tupac photo in ten years.)
Favors was...less so. He talked in a hushed, low murmur, and appeared to be hiding behind his (admittedly enormous) Nets draft cap at times. He gave clipped answers to questions and said generally little of interest. He didn't sound like a complete dunce or anything, he just sounded like something of a dullard. Now, in the grand scheme of things, does that really matter? If Favors can finish on the break, patrol the paint and play inside-out, will anyone care in five years if his favorite sandwich is peanut butter and jelly and he only got a C+ on his high school book report on Moby Dick? Of course not. Besides, Favors is only 19, and has as much of a chance to grow into his own skin as a person than as a player as the years progress.
But when picking this high in the draft--and the Sixers might not get to pick this high again for a long time--do you really want to choose a franchise savior that can't even handle a room full of (predominantly) scruffy-looking middle-aged dudes, let alone 20,000 screaming fans at Madison Square Garden? Regardless of what either player ends up being on the floor, what the Sixers need arguably more than anything is a leader, someone to change the culture of the locker room and be the primary figure to answer for both the team's successes and their failures. They need someone to do for them what Brandon Roy did for the Blazers, what Chris Paul did for the Hornets, what Kevin Durant did for the Sonics/Thunder. Whether or not you believe Turner is that guy--and I'm pretty sure that I do--one thing I think we can definitely all agree on is that Favors isn't.
So even if in five years Favors is the next Amar'e Stoudemire and Turner the next Randy Foye, I'll still believe that Stefanski, lord love him, made the right decision--the only decision--on draft night, 2010. At least that's what I'll tell myself when we're anticipating the lottery yet again, hoping that this time we finally get the guy who turns it all around.
(Photo again from the Sixers' Twitpic account. Turner will be introduced by the Sixers at a press conference around 12:30 today, if you want to see him in action yourself, or check it on CSNPhilly.com after.)